Peanuts cartoon:
The character, Rerun, was hiding under a bed. Lucy asked if he's coming to school. Rerun said "no" because, he exclaimed, the teacher was sarcastic to him. The teacher had asked him if he thought he had "learned everything he needed to know." Lucy, being Lucy, queried "Well, do you think you've learned everything you need to know?" Rerun replied, "I think I've learned everything I need to know to live under a bed."
Rerun's philosophy, at this stage of his young life appears to be, "If I'm going to live under a bed for the rest of my life, what is the sense of learning anything more? Logical, but somewhat flawed, thinking
Maybe today all he needs to learn is what's necessary to live "under a bed," but tomorrow he may find himself "under a dresser." Does he know how to live under a dresser, or does he only have "under the bed" skills?
I remember attending a then live concert by the now dead Jim Croce.
He was a gifted songwriter, minstrel and between-songs philosopher. That evening he spoke of his college experiences and said, "During four years of college I took philosophy, psychology, sociology, all of these "ologies," and I came out totally prepared for life in the 12th century."
If you don't learn how to learn, you will be, just as surely as the terminally inconvenienced Mr. Croce or the dust bunny covered Rerun, preparing for life under a bed in the 12th century. You'll find yourself able to function quite well in a world that has ceased to exist.
For those who use statistics to generate personal excitement, try these: 95 percent of what you use daily is learned after you leave school. Every five years 50 percent of what you know becomes obsolete. Doesn't say much for stagnant learning does it?
If you don't buy those statistics, and believe you have all the education you'll ever need with your high school, college or college plus degrees, try this little exercise. Dredge up the report card from your last year of formal education. See if you even remember taking a particular course, much less what was taught in that class. How would you do if you took a test today on the material you were exposed to in your last year of school?
With the high obsolescence rate of your knowledge you obviously can't rely on "used learning." Therefore continuous learning is critical at all stages of life. But of the gabillion things there are to learn, what specifically do YOU need to learn? Selective learning is no easy task considering you have very little idea of what you should select to learn.
No matter how well you have planned your life, your life has a life of its own and that life is full of surprises of all sizes. What do you need to learn when your spouse runs off with the circus? Didn't plan on that I bet. How about a job loss; quadruplets; lottery winning; hemorrhoids; aging?
It is one heck of a challenge to prepare for a life that has never been lived before. Will life hide you under the bed or stick you on the top shelf?
Lesson: Learn something everyday; you're never sure what you'll need to know or when you'll need to know it.
The following lessons were taken from my unpublished manuscript entitled, The Second Mouse Gets The Cheese: Lessons you don’t have to learn yourself. Since all of the lessons have been produced as entries in this Blog there are no more new entries. I have started a new Blog entitled, Thoughts From The Far Side Of The Hill which will begin 2/10/13. Hopefully you will visit us at http://lodestar2.blogspot.com/

The all-leather, NFL-regulation football, inscribed -- 1963 Chicago Bears
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
IS GOOD GOOD ENOUGH?
Growing up in a middle-class neighborhood, getting B- grades in school, being chosen 5th out of 11 for the block football team, being promoted with peers, being in the top 40 percent in income, having 2.5 children, living in a house costing $10,000 more than the median.
That's all good, right? Yes, but that much good can be bad.
When what you have is desired by 3/4 of the world's population, your drive to improve is weakened, because not much more is expected of you. If as a kid you were consistently picked 11 out of 11, a desire may have been triggered to "show them" by improving so to became more wanted by the others. Or you might say, "the heck with it," and never play football again. Being picked 5th is good -- good enough.
When making $5000 more in yearly income than you ever dreamed you would make is good, where is the incentive to exceed your dream by even more? It takes significant effort and energy to move to the next level in life. When you are hurting, miserable and down, that effort becomes worth making. When your life is "good," that effort is often seen as not worth expending.
Frequently in stories of successful people, we read of their disadvantaged background or possibly they came from great wealth and managed to keep and/or increase their fortune. How much do you read about successful people who started out just a tad above average? Either they don't make good copy or there are not too many of them.
I believe climbing to the top from the bottom is easier than climbing from the middle to the top.
Lesson: The major obstacle to being great tomorrow is being good today.
That's all good, right? Yes, but that much good can be bad.
When what you have is desired by 3/4 of the world's population, your drive to improve is weakened, because not much more is expected of you. If as a kid you were consistently picked 11 out of 11, a desire may have been triggered to "show them" by improving so to became more wanted by the others. Or you might say, "the heck with it," and never play football again. Being picked 5th is good -- good enough.
When making $5000 more in yearly income than you ever dreamed you would make is good, where is the incentive to exceed your dream by even more? It takes significant effort and energy to move to the next level in life. When you are hurting, miserable and down, that effort becomes worth making. When your life is "good," that effort is often seen as not worth expending.
Frequently in stories of successful people, we read of their disadvantaged background or possibly they came from great wealth and managed to keep and/or increase their fortune. How much do you read about successful people who started out just a tad above average? Either they don't make good copy or there are not too many of them.
I believe climbing to the top from the bottom is easier than climbing from the middle to the top.
Lesson: The major obstacle to being great tomorrow is being good today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)